CAN THIS SYMPHONY BE SAVED?
Columbus Symphony may slash players, season, budget
Musicians of the Columbus Symphony are in shock according to a story in today's Dispatch, about the news that Columbus Symphony board leaders are proposing a restructuring plan that will cut its musicians by 40 percent -- from 53 to 31 -- and reduce its performance weeks from 46 to 34. All that, of course, will slash $3 million from the orchestra's annual budget of $12 million.
The "other" CSO employs about 10 Cincinnati players on a regular basis.
To compare, our own CSO has 92 musicians (also a reduction), a 52-week contract and about a $35 million budget.
"We feel completely betrayed," Jim Akins, orchestra committee chair, told the Dispatch. He fears that it will mean the end of the Columbus Symphony.
The Columbus Symphony anticipates a $1.5 million deficit this year, and had $2.2 million in red ink last season. Ticket sales have been disappointing but improved slightly -- but corporate and individual donors are lagging, the article says.
It's sad, too, for the new music director, Junichi Hirokami, who is in his second season.
The orchestra has had a rocky history with its executive directors. It nearly crumbled under the burden of a $2 million debt and a musicians' strike during the reign of a previous music director Christian Badea. In 1998, the board ousted its executive director after an unexpected large operating deficit.
Recently, the musicians have taken a pay cut and a reduction of performance weeks, hoping they'd be reinstated.
This followed a public outcry and another contentious period between musicians, board and the public, when in May 2002, the board refused to renew the contract of popular music director Alessandro Siciliani. Shocked symphony fans formed a grass-roots movement to reinstate the maestro.
In 2004, the orchestra found itself without a music director, an executive director and a board chair. In addition, both the former board chair and the interim president were in trouble with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Then in 2006, Hirokami, a popular guest conductor with the Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra, was given a three-year contract as music director. ...
Across the river in Louisville, things have fared no better with the Louisville Orchestra.
Clearly, there is something very wrong with this whole orchestra industry business model, especially when people in the general public are not committing to subscriptions. Clearly today's boards of trustees seem completely disconnected from the public that it so desperately needs. Then there's the fundraising issue. In Cincinnati, there have been loyal major million-dollar donors, but the annual fund hasn't included as many small donors across the entire community as is typical of other major orchestras.
IDEAS??
13 Comments:
All American orchestras need more government support. The only way orchestras survive and prosper in Europe is because they receive extensive government support. American orchestras are the best in the world, and it's just tragic that they have to struggle like they do. Yet musicians all over the world come HERE to study music. We would do well to emulate the support that other countries give their arts groups.
Does it really make sense to give goverment support to an organization that is in trouble because of declining attendance? In theory you could eventually be supporting an art form that is playing to an empty house. The answer to these problems can be found within the symphonic industry itself, but it is going to have to reinvent itself with a new business model for the 21st century and stop running itself like people are still wearing knee britches and powdered wigs.
While those of us who attend the symphony and other related art forms (ballet, opera, etc.)in desreasing numbers relish what it brings to ones life and the culture of the community I cannot embrace the concept,even remotely, of taxpayers subsidizing my or anyone elses entertainment in the form of the symphony. They better find the answer within themsleves or be prepared to go the way of chariot races.
Steve Deiters/Oakley
Is it a fact that the CSO's annual fund "hasn't included as many small donors across the entire community as is typical of other major orchestras?"
This is what some various countries spend per capita on the arts:
Finland: $53
Israel: $17
UK: $11-$14
USA: $.48 (yes, 48 CENTS)
Need I say more?
More government support?? No, NO, NO and NO....
The more that government "supports" the more things get screwed up. This country needs LESS government support, LESS government intrusion into every aspect of our lives, and God knows, less taxes.
Let's stop looking to government to solve every single, solitary ill.
The symphonies of this country need to work out solutions independent of the government laying on its heavy, clumsy hands.
Steve, you are SO on point! Thanks for your eloquence.
How much did Paul Brown Stadium cost? Who paid for that? Oh, right.
It seems as though everytime discussions of this type come up the standard of comparison reverts to the taxpayer monument to the Brown family legacy on the riverfront. I voted against it, wrote letters to the editor opposing its construction, and I'm still opposed to the concept in principle. To use a sports stadium it as a justification for enhanced subsidies for the arts is warping logic into another dimension. The Bengals would have survived no matter if the taxpayers would have built a stadium or not. They were just smarter than the people they were negotiating with and prevailed. Music Hall,Memorial Hall, and the Aronoff Center as I recall are owned by local govermental entities and managed by others.
I think that people in the arts (management)should at least make an effort to start operating their respective organizations with the business model of a for profit enterprise instead of walking around with their hat in hand wondering why they are not appreciated to the degree they perceive by the masses and they have overspent themselves into a corner.
Put your thinking caps on and you'll succeed. Keep doing the same thing and ...well you see what is happening.
Steve Deiters/Oakley
So Steve, is it still an Arts organization if it's producing popular entertainment. You've often mentioned the need for a different approach and I'm not clear on what you mean and what this type of organization would look like and what it would produce(for lack of a better word). The arts often don't have a mass appeal...
Guys, the Columbus Symphony gets 4% of its budget from the Federal, Local and State Government combined. It's not exactly being funded by the government and I really don't think people want to go down that road. Honestly though, the cost of an orchestra versus the cost of those two football stadiums in Cincy, it's peanuts. We are talking about a proposal in Columbus that is soely put in place so the "Bored Board" can take an easy way out. Cincinnati and Cleveland get huge support for their orchestra, yet in Columbus it goes by the wayside. Of that 4% that the government does give, it does go to the community. The orchestra gives free concerts for school children each year, the 4 different youth symphonies, small ensembles that do charity work in the community, would not be possible without this support. Members of the CSO teach lessons to inner city music students, youth symphony coachings, there are so many things that musicians do for their city. It's not just entertainment, this week the Columbus Symphony is doing 4 public school concerts, they are in places that the students do not get this opportunity. Where does that money come from? Thursday night, the Orchestra is doing a benefit concert in Westerville, Ohio, partly to help sponsor a youth symphony trip for them. Please understand that Football is Entertainment, what orchestral musicians do is far more than just entertainment. Do you see 8 out of our 53 players getting arrested like the bengals? Support the arts!!!!
I support the arts. The government should not be involved. And not in sports either.
I think the Columbus Symphony has to start over. Just offer the musicians some percentage of the box office after all expenses are paid. It might affect the quality of the group, but who cares?
Janelle Gelfand is the music critic for the Cincinnati Enquirer. First scan her blog (http://frontier.cincinnati.com/blogs/classical/2008/01/can-this-symphony-be-saved.asp#comments) to get a sense of what it's about and what it covers. Then read the blog titled, "Can This Symphony Be Saved?" Read the posts to this blog as well. This blog refers to an article in the Monday, Jan. 21 issue of the Columbus Dispatch about the financial straits of the Columbus Symphony.
Write two or three paragraphs (or as much as it takes) in response to this blog and to the reader responses. You can also comment on the Classical Music blog itself.
There are three roads the symphony has to choose from if it wishes to remain in existence in today's society and both of these have to do with one major change, pleasing the masses. What it comes down to is the fact that as a whole the people of America are not terribly interested in what classical musicians have to offer; namely because they see us as self righteous, stuck up know-it-alls (which is not always too terribly far from the truth, unfortunately.) So the task then would be to get the general populous interested in what we as musicians have to offer. I have three propositions for just that.
The first possibility, is to bring our performances down to the level that the audience can appreciate. Today's audiences thirst for high impact "in-your-face" kinds of performances. What they don't realize is that there are classical pieces that have all those properties because they see them all as stuffy chamber music. A great way to solve this issue would be to give them something to look at during the performances, say a slide show with beautiful imagery that coincided with the orchestral work being played or an opera that is placed in a more modern setting so that the people are actually able to identify with the characters being portrayed instead of looking at wigged Victorians speaking in some Greek they could never understand.
The next possibility is to educate the audience, the best way to do that is to begin to educate the children. Get them to come at a young age. It has been said that the music people find to sound the most "right" to them is whatever they were listening to between the ages of ten and fourteen. Teens today are listening to pop and rick, not that those are illegitimate art forms at all but they are missing out on an entire invigorating and incredible genre because "only adults are supposed to be listening to that stuff." No get kids while they are still young and will perhaps still listen and then you will have a strong audience again.
The final solution is simply a mix of the above mentioned choices, bring in an audience with something they already think they will enjoy and begin to educate them and continue to educate them by getting them to come back. The best way to get them to come back is to, instead of having an imposing atmosphere, have a welcoming one where there is true interpersonal communication between the audience and the performer(s). This is what will begin to bolster the attendances of the symphonies and possibly both preserve and evolve the art.
CSO is in financial trouble not because of failures by it's musicians, nor by declining attendance. They are in trouble because the CSO board of directors have utter failed to meet their fiduciary responsibilities to the orchestra, the orchestra's financial supporters, and the community. They are now looking to make the orchestra take a hit for their failures. Someone needs to step in and remove the people that caused the problems and put in a board that can, and will, do its job.
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.
<< Home